Real Estate

real estate:


a broader idea ~ people own two and three homes, and are encouraged to take out loans against that third or second home (3), there by increasing the sell and growth of the real estate market, making investing and loans safer and more secure, it's so simple. How is this accomplished, by increasing the amount of moneys that people have to spend in economy & by lowering the price of homes to an extent so that it makes them temporarily more affordable and encourage buys. I can't think of anyone who wouldn’t be happy about this one. Might would need some help and cooperation from the "legal" perspective, laws to ensure first homeowner rights, for protection of peoples' first and second homes. Second homes would relate to divorces and better ensure stability of divorced homes, families, and induviduals. Would need a law to protect people's first home from confiscation. But the second or third home which the loan was liened against would be collateral and bankable upon failure to make payments, etc. Selling, marketing, making things affordable, a variety of price ranges to accommodate different incomes and also people should be encouraged to buy homes two or three for the price of one, or should be encouraged to buy houses at which are at about the same price level as the other. However it could work on an uneven keel as well. lower prices of home should be temporary, so that it does not drive down the overall wealth of housing broad scale & so that a rise in real estate worth has a rise after a time to bring a rise in worth to the homes, there by further creating more stability in future markets and thereby recovering the real estate markets in general, however in the future, multiple home buying should still be encouraged as well as a vast diversity of availability of pricing so that people can afford to buy a home in their price range : ) Diversity is key, availability is key, variance in market is key, marketing & selling are key, expansion and growth in this case. Logic: if people can afford to live in their homes then they have money to spend elsewhere, or even on a second or third home. if people own more homes it gives rise to more nationwide security, more collateral, & a general overall rise in society further. if they are not "having" to spend half their paycheck on a first home, they have that money for growth in other areas. Let us encourage people to buy more than one home, let us protect people's first homes, and let us lower or even get rid of those payments that people tool out to pay for those very high and lengthy mortgages on their first or temporary home. But this must work in conjunction, we have to get that marketing/propaganda out there ~ people must want to and be encouraged and be in a place to buy more than one home. real estate could give out two for one deals in home selling, or even three or four for one deals in their selling practices : ) this would encourage the sell of homes, this would enumerate the sell of homes broad scale nationwide, would also encourage more construction, as well as a diversity of construction of new homes and renovations to existing homes across the country. Wildfire.

Test market: the test markets are already there, there are already examples of how this type of community works & how it benefits society, it's long range implecations as well as it's short term affects.